3/11/2023 0 Comments Togethershare data recovery reviewFor example, if you are an IT person who sometimes does logical recoveries, and your employer uses NAS devices with RAID, UFS would require you to spend more money on a capable version. For a home or small business user, I think it's often a better choice than UFS Explorer, because it has more capabilities included in a standard license than UFS or Recovery Explorer do. I'm probably going to stop using R-Studio professionally, in part because it's $800, and I don't really find that it does anything that others don't for me. Now, a lot of those professional grade tools have become very close in behavior and performance, and sometimes you can end up having too many of them. It's been awhile since I did this, but I used to sometimes try the consumer grade crap tools against situations that I was able to solve without incident by using something like R-Studio or GetDataBack. ![]() What I like to do is actually try the demonstration versions of some of these tools against drive images from successful recoveries. It was not my first choice for anything, but frequently made a good showing as a subsequent attempt. It still can in some cases, but not as consistently. It had some somewhat unique ways of trying to reassemble a file system, and could often get results in situations that would confuse other data recovery products. I feel like it has become a little bit too automated, in a way no longer true to its original design intent, which is making no assumptions about anything. For example, I am not a fan of recent versions of ZAR. And now you see why I almost always put a shorter answer post and then edit it when I'm working from my phone.Įdit: so one thing that was kind of bothering me about this, and I am not exactly sure how to explain it completely, but basically these programs do sometimes change from one version to the next. Feel free to correct me if I mis-categorized something from OP's list, I'm doing this on my phone. Generally, cloning first (with DDRescue or HDDSuperClone) would be the best first step. The spreadsheet linked above has some minimal non-comprehensive notes about this. The above tools all have something they're best at, so context really matters. There's a list of some in the sidebar of r/AskADataRecoveryPro. Non-free but better than other listed toolsĭm Disk Editor (DMDE - has the most generous free trial of any reputable tool)ĭata Rescue (old and inferior to most tools)Īs for actual competent tools, the majority of them aren't even included in this incredibly long list. Somewhat new so many specialists aren't strongly opinionated about it yet RAW recovery is sometimes the only option, but it should be a last resort due to its significant drawbacks. File System metadata like name and location will be lost, so you'll have hundreds of thousands of files up into the millions to sift through in most cases. This is the worst kind of recovery - it is only capable of recovering non-fragmented files and will recover 10+ false positives for each actual file. It's not exactly good at un-deleting either, but it's free. Despite their claims that it can recover data in the case of damaged file system or formatting, it is terrible at that. Recuva - Un-delete tool, for un-deleting files removed from the operating system's delete function. Everything it can do can be done by the free trial of DMDE but a million times better and more user friendly. Testdisk - partition manipulation tool ONLY. Just okay - a mix of many tools under the hood, which is not really a good thing. The resultant clone will still need recovery software run against it in most cases as logical damage resulting from failure is cloned with the data Tools that assist in data recovery that are not file recovery toolsĭdrescue - cloning tool designed to clone failing drives. Stellar (anything from them except photo repair tool) Ontrack Easyrecovery (re-branded Stellar) Literal scams, misleading about their capabilities, non-insustry-accepted, overall garbage, or a mix:Īdvanced Disk Recovery – Ultimate Softwareĭisk Drill (garbage EXCEPT with damaged Time Machine backups) As for your list, here's a breakdown of it: If you want to skip over all the rest of this, see this. Is there an updated wiki comparision someone has made of which is better? ![]() The second tool they list is hot well-advertised garbage, so I'm going to say no, that list is total crap. If the drive is unhealthy in any way shape or form, the drive is still in use, or if TRIM / UNMAP is involved, yes Would it do a lot more damage if you use all the tools, or it doesnt really matter? Which are the better paid data recovery tools for future use when need to recover in future? They're pretty much all not great, but we'll get to that later Which are the better free data recovery tools? Better to try than nothing.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |